When Helping Becomes Enmeshment

Social pedagogical work - especially with severely traumatized people - is never just work.

It is relationship. Encounter. A space of resonance. Under these conditions, the risk of enmeshment is not an exception, but a structural reality of the work.

In my current work with Sensitive Rebels, I practice holistic, integrative trauma work grounded in Neurosystemic Integration®, developed by Verena König. This framework has allowed me to retrospectively contextualize many of my own professional experiences and to conceptualize a phenomenon I had long perceived intuitively: enmeshment with the history of our clients - especially the ones we work for in long-hour-shifts, is not a personal shortcoming or lack of professionalism, but a predictable outcome of attachment dynamics, trauma exposure, and neurobiological resonance.

When A Client’s Trauma Touches Our Own Story

Working closely with traumatized individuals inevitably confronts practitioners with their own internal material. This includes unintegrated aspects of the self, habitual protective strategies, and deeply ingrained survival responses shaped by earlier relational experiences.

Often quietly. Subtly. And precisely because of that, profoundly effective.

Practitioners may find themselves over-identifying with a client’s suffering, assuming excessive emotional or moral responsibility, or moving into rescuing or over-functioning roles. Such responses are rarely the result of insufficient training or ethical awareness. More often, they emerge from unconscious resonance within the practitioner’s own nervous system.

Trauma resonates with trauma.

Attachment systems interact with attachment systems.

Implicit relational memory, which frequently is rooted in early childhood experiences, can be activated without conscious intent.

Enmeshment Is Not a Sign Of Failure - But It Requires Awareness

In the social pedagogical field, there is often an unspoken expectation to be stable, professional, and resilient. What is rarely named openly is this:

This work inevitably brings up our own unresolved material.

Issues related to boundaries, closeness and distance, responsibility, loyalty, and helplessness are structurally embedded in relational work. Without ongoing self-reflection and embodied self-awareness, practitioners are at risk of reenacting their own unresolved patterns within professional relationships.

This is why I am deeply convinced that people working in this field need more than professional expertise.

They need self-experience.

A willingness to question themselves honestly.

And the courage to look at their own inner dynamics – not as a weakness, but as a prerequisite for sustainable, healthy work.

Sensitive Rebels: Awareness Instead of Self-Abandonment

My work with Sensitive Rebels is grounded in this understanding. - Rather than promoting endurance, self-sacrifice, or emotional overextension, the focus lies on cultivating awareness of one’s own nervous system processes and relational patterns.

Enmeshment arises where we lose ourselves while being there for others. Integration begins where we include ourselves in the work.

From my perspective, this constitutes the core of genuinely trauma-informed and holistic social pedagogical practice:

Compassion without self-abandonment.

Relational closeness without fusion.

Connection without entanglement.

Zurück
Zurück

When Care Has No Place In The System

Weiter
Weiter

Three Months Are Not a Promise of ‘Healing’